He sees the most powerful force against western liberalization as being faith. The big bad "F" word - Faith and civilization are treated synonymous. As an extension, he posits that the concept of different civilizations, as the highest rank of cultural identity, will become increasingly useful in analyzing the potential for conflict. Objectivity is stressed, but rarely executed.Conflicts in the 21st century are different from conflicts of the past 19th century = conflicts mostly about competition over colonial interests 20th century = defined mostly by ideology the primary axis of conflict in the future will be along cultural lines. It is a hot topic and anything said about it will have drastic results. Exposure to the case, the jury report, primary sources and the like over opinions and potential political outcomes. Ferguson - whether or not those talking about it are truly objective or are pushing their own agendas. Biases can be part of translation, and their realization in articles like this are inflammatory. "Ahmadinejad gloated publicly over the death of Israelis in a terror bombing in Bulgaria, and hinted Iran responsible." In this case it was important to know who did and how the translation was conducted to know what choices were made for interpreting ambiguous words and terms. It is the grain of salt with which information must be taken. The epistemology of an information creator is vital to understanding the information product because it can reveal biases, conflicts of interest, validity or information, logicality, and the lens through which the creator was looking when the information was produced.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |